I built three tools last month. Little things: a script runner, a markdown converter, something to track my workouts.
Each one took a few hours. Ship, share, move on.
But here's what I noticed: I wasn't the only one doing this. Everyone's shipping apps now. My Twitter feed is full of "built this in 2 hours with AI" posts. Product Hunt has 50 new AI-built tools every day.
And most of them are ghost towns by week two.
The vibe coding trap I fell into
When building gets this easy, you stop asking if you should build something. You just build it.
I did it too. Had an idea, opened Lovable, described what I wanted. Two hours later I had a working app. Felt like magic.
But then nobody used it. Not because it was broken. Because nobody needed it except me.
Multiply this by thousands of builders doing the same thing. That's where we are now.
Everyone can build. Nobody knows what to build.
The tools work. Really well.
Lovable hit $17M ARR in 90 days. They have 500,000 users building 25,000 new apps daily. You can literally describe an app and have it running in production within hours.
Which sounds amazing until you realize: if everyone can build anything, building isn't the differentiator anymore.
The differentiator is building the right thing.
Why 90% of vibe-coded apps die
I started paying attention to what happens after the launch tweets:
Day 1: "Just shipped [cool app]! Built in 3 hours with AI!"
Day 2: 100 signups from the launch hype
Day 7: Daily users drop to 10
Day 14: Creator moves on to the next idea
Day 30: App is effectively dead
The pattern repeats. Over and over.
These aren't bad apps. They're just solutions looking for problems. Or solutions to problems people won't pay to solve. Or solutions that miss what users actually need.
When building was hard, you had to validate first. Now you can build first and ask questions later.
That's backwards.
The feedback loop nobody talks about
Here's what separates the builders making money from the ones collecting dead apps:
They ship their first version as a question, not an answer.
They don't build features because they seem cool. They build what users beg for. They fix what users complain about. They double down on what users love.
The speed of vibe coding only matters if you're iterating toward something people want.
Think about it: you can implement a feature request in the morning and ship it by lunch. You can fix a confusing flow before users churn. You can pivot the entire product in a weekend.
But only if you know what to build next.
Stop guessing. Start listening.
You need three things to make vibe coding profitable:
1. A way for users to complain without friction
Not just an email buried in your footer. Put a widget right in your app. Make it one click to report an issue or suggest something.
When someone hits friction, you want to know immediately. Not after they've already churned.
2. A public place for feature requests
Users need to see that you're listening. That other people want the same things. That their input shapes the product.
This isn't just about collecting feedback. It's about building in public. Showing your roadmap. Creating buy-in.
When users see their requested feature go from "planned" to "shipped," they become evangelists.
3. A changelog that actually gets read
Every update should tell a story: "You asked, we built it."
Users don't care about your refactoring. They care that you fixed the thing that annoyed them. That you added the export they needed. That you listened.
I built UserJot because I needed exactly this for my own projects. But use whatever works for you. The tool doesn't matter. The feedback loop does.
The 10x advantage of fast builders
Traditional development killed startups slowly. You'd spend months building the wrong thing.
Vibe coding lets you fail fast. Or succeed fast. But only if you're listening.
Someone complains about your onboarding? Fix it today.
Multiple users request the same feature? Ship it tomorrow.
Your main feature is too buried? Restructure tonight.
This is the real power. Not that you can build fast. But that you can respond fast.
The builders who get this are printing money. The ones who don't have impressive GitHub profiles full of dead projects.
My new rule: No features without requests
I stopped building what I think is cool. Started building only what users ask for.
It's harder than it sounds. You'll have "brilliant" ideas. You'll want to add that clever feature. You'll see another app doing something interesting.
Ignore all of it.
Build only what your users tell you to build. It feels limiting at first. Then you realize it's freeing. No more guessing. No more building in the dark.
Just pure signal.
How to know if you're building the wrong thing
Simple test:
The right thing sells itself. Users beg for more. They complain when it's down. They tell their friends.
Everything else is just you playing with code.
The uncomfortable truth about vibe coding
Making building easy didn't make success easy. It just made failure faster.
But that's actually good. Fail faster. Learn faster. Find what works faster.
The builders who understand this are unstoppable. They can test 10 ideas in the time it used to take to build one. They can pivot based on real feedback, not gut feelings.
They're not just building faster. They're learning faster.
Your playbook for profitable vibe coding
Here's exactly what to do:
Week 1: Build the absolute minimum that solves one problem
Week 2: Get 10 people using it (friends don't count)
Week 3: Make it stupid easy for them to tell you what sucks
Week 4: Build only what they ask for
Week 5: Show them you built it
Repeat until profitable
That's it. No complex strategy. No growth hacks. Just build, listen, repeat.
The builders who get this are already winning
While everyone else is starting their 15th weekend project, a small group of builders is quietly printing money.
They're not smarter. They're not better at prompting. They just learned to listen before they build.
They turned vibe coding from a toy into a business model.
Final thought: Building is the easy part now
This is weird to say, but it's true. Building software is no longer the hard part.
Finding what to build is hard.
Getting people to use it is hard.
Making them pay is hard.
But if you nail the feedback loop, the rest gets easier. You stop guessing. You start knowing.
The tools have changed. The game hasn't. You still need to build something people want.
The only difference? Now you can figure out what that is in days instead of years.
So stop building your assumptions. Start building their solutions.
This is exactly what I'm doing with UserJot. Some days it's humbling. Some days it's exciting. But every day, the path forward is clear because users make it clear.
That's the real power of vibe coding. Not the speed of building. The speed of learning.
Use it.
P.S. If you're vibe coding something right now, consider setting up a feedback loop before you ship your next feature. UserJot makes it easy, but honestly, even a simple form beats building blind. Just start listening.
More...
Each one took a few hours. Ship, share, move on.
But here's what I noticed: I wasn't the only one doing this. Everyone's shipping apps now. My Twitter feed is full of "built this in 2 hours with AI" posts. Product Hunt has 50 new AI-built tools every day.
And most of them are ghost towns by week two.
The vibe coding trap I fell into
When building gets this easy, you stop asking if you should build something. You just build it.
I did it too. Had an idea, opened Lovable, described what I wanted. Two hours later I had a working app. Felt like magic.
But then nobody used it. Not because it was broken. Because nobody needed it except me.
Multiply this by thousands of builders doing the same thing. That's where we are now.
Everyone can build. Nobody knows what to build.
The tools work. Really well.
Lovable hit $17M ARR in 90 days. They have 500,000 users building 25,000 new apps daily. You can literally describe an app and have it running in production within hours.
Which sounds amazing until you realize: if everyone can build anything, building isn't the differentiator anymore.
The differentiator is building the right thing.
Why 90% of vibe-coded apps die
I started paying attention to what happens after the launch tweets:
Day 1: "Just shipped [cool app]! Built in 3 hours with AI!"
Day 2: 100 signups from the launch hype
Day 7: Daily users drop to 10
Day 14: Creator moves on to the next idea
Day 30: App is effectively dead
The pattern repeats. Over and over.
These aren't bad apps. They're just solutions looking for problems. Or solutions to problems people won't pay to solve. Or solutions that miss what users actually need.
When building was hard, you had to validate first. Now you can build first and ask questions later.
That's backwards.
The feedback loop nobody talks about
Here's what separates the builders making money from the ones collecting dead apps:
They ship their first version as a question, not an answer.
They don't build features because they seem cool. They build what users beg for. They fix what users complain about. They double down on what users love.
The speed of vibe coding only matters if you're iterating toward something people want.
Think about it: you can implement a feature request in the morning and ship it by lunch. You can fix a confusing flow before users churn. You can pivot the entire product in a weekend.
But only if you know what to build next.
Stop guessing. Start listening.
You need three things to make vibe coding profitable:
1. A way for users to complain without friction
Not just an email buried in your footer. Put a widget right in your app. Make it one click to report an issue or suggest something.
When someone hits friction, you want to know immediately. Not after they've already churned.
2. A public place for feature requests
Users need to see that you're listening. That other people want the same things. That their input shapes the product.
This isn't just about collecting feedback. It's about building in public. Showing your roadmap. Creating buy-in.
When users see their requested feature go from "planned" to "shipped," they become evangelists.
3. A changelog that actually gets read
Every update should tell a story: "You asked, we built it."
Users don't care about your refactoring. They care that you fixed the thing that annoyed them. That you added the export they needed. That you listened.
I built UserJot because I needed exactly this for my own projects. But use whatever works for you. The tool doesn't matter. The feedback loop does.
The 10x advantage of fast builders
Traditional development killed startups slowly. You'd spend months building the wrong thing.
Vibe coding lets you fail fast. Or succeed fast. But only if you're listening.
Someone complains about your onboarding? Fix it today.
Multiple users request the same feature? Ship it tomorrow.
Your main feature is too buried? Restructure tonight.
This is the real power. Not that you can build fast. But that you can respond fast.
The builders who get this are printing money. The ones who don't have impressive GitHub profiles full of dead projects.
My new rule: No features without requests
I stopped building what I think is cool. Started building only what users ask for.
It's harder than it sounds. You'll have "brilliant" ideas. You'll want to add that clever feature. You'll see another app doing something interesting.
Ignore all of it.
Build only what your users tell you to build. It feels limiting at first. Then you realize it's freeing. No more guessing. No more building in the dark.
Just pure signal.
How to know if you're building the wrong thing
Simple test:
- If you're adding features and usage stays flat, you're building the wrong thing
- If you're explaining why your app is useful, you're building the wrong thing
- If your users aren't telling other people about it, you're building the wrong thing
The right thing sells itself. Users beg for more. They complain when it's down. They tell their friends.
Everything else is just you playing with code.
The uncomfortable truth about vibe coding
Making building easy didn't make success easy. It just made failure faster.
But that's actually good. Fail faster. Learn faster. Find what works faster.
The builders who understand this are unstoppable. They can test 10 ideas in the time it used to take to build one. They can pivot based on real feedback, not gut feelings.
They're not just building faster. They're learning faster.
Your playbook for profitable vibe coding
Here's exactly what to do:
Week 1: Build the absolute minimum that solves one problem
Week 2: Get 10 people using it (friends don't count)
Week 3: Make it stupid easy for them to tell you what sucks
Week 4: Build only what they ask for
Week 5: Show them you built it
Repeat until profitable
That's it. No complex strategy. No growth hacks. Just build, listen, repeat.
The builders who get this are already winning
While everyone else is starting their 15th weekend project, a small group of builders is quietly printing money.
They're not smarter. They're not better at prompting. They just learned to listen before they build.
They turned vibe coding from a toy into a business model.
Final thought: Building is the easy part now
This is weird to say, but it's true. Building software is no longer the hard part.
Finding what to build is hard.
Getting people to use it is hard.
Making them pay is hard.
But if you nail the feedback loop, the rest gets easier. You stop guessing. You start knowing.
The tools have changed. The game hasn't. You still need to build something people want.
The only difference? Now you can figure out what that is in days instead of years.
So stop building your assumptions. Start building their solutions.
This is exactly what I'm doing with UserJot. Some days it's humbling. Some days it's exciting. But every day, the path forward is clear because users make it clear.
That's the real power of vibe coding. Not the speed of building. The speed of learning.
Use it.
P.S. If you're vibe coding something right now, consider setting up a feedback loop before you ship your next feature. UserJot makes it easy, but honestly, even a simple form beats building blind. Just start listening.
More...